Monday, November 30, 2020

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night


Executive Summary

In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major “vote spikes” that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these “vote spikes.” Critics point to suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, to cast doubt on the legitimacy of some of these spikes. While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny. 

This is one such case: Our analysis finds that a few key vote updates in competitive states were unusually large in size and had an unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratio. We demonstrate the results differ enough from expected results to be cause for concern.

With this report, we rely only on publicly available data from the New York Times to identify and analyze statistical anomalies in key states. Looking at 8,954 individual vote updates (differences in vote totals for each candidate between successive changes to the running vote totals, colloquially also referred to as “dumps” or “batches”), we discover a remarkably consistent mathematical property: there is a clear inverse relationship between difference in candidates’ vote counts and and the ratio of the vote counts. (In other words, it's not surprising to see vote updates with large margins, and it's not surprising to see vote updates with very large ratios of support between the candidates, but it is surprising to see vote updates which are both). 

The significance of this property will be further explained in later sections of this report. Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow this statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential  with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.

In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers.

The four vote updates in question are: 

1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump

2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump

3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump

4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

This report predicts what these vote updates would have looked like, had they followed the same pattern as the vast majority of the 8,950 others. We find that the extents of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — which collectively represent forty-two electoral votes.

Extensive mathematical detail is provided and the data and the code (for the data-curation, data transformation, plotting, and modeling) are all attached in the appendixto this document[1].

Read the whole thing at: 

"It's the outsiders who change the world...” -- President Donald J. Trump


Robert Knight: Big Tech Rigged 2020 Election 

President Trump's Thanksgiving Videoconference with US Military & Press Questions on Election 2020


Sunday, November 29, 2020

Friday, November 27, 2020

Quitting LinkedIn Due To Censorship

Unsatisfactory response from LinkedIn to my appeal of their unjustified post blocking. 

In my opinion, their response was just plain unresponsive--no reasons, no evidence, no answers to my questions, no explanation of the process of adjudication. 

Of course, no names of any responsible person. 

Absolutely unreasonable, unfair, arbitrary, and apparently dishonest in my opinion.

The original suspension indicates to me that I may have been defamed by someone on LinkedIn without have had a chance to respond. I guess I'll never know what the basis of the charge was, nor how it was adjudicated.

No justice.

So looks like I'll be quitting LinkedIn, due to censorship:

Is this the USA or USSR?

It is just unbelievable to someone who grew up in the United States of America that in the last few days because of censorship of criticism of the Biden Campaign, I have had to quit Twitter, quit my column for, and had a post banned on LinkedIn.

Literally unprecedented. Never happened to me before. Ever.

So, I have joined Gab and Parler and MeWe and Rumble.

I am glad they are there to provide safe harbors...but never in a million years thought that the USA would become a country that permits political persecution of dissent with approval of the national press, major corporations, educational, cultural and religious institutions--and apparently with cooperation of federal, state and local governments.

If this is happening to a very small fry like me, it is happening to everyone.

Chilling foreshadowing of repression to come, unless President Trump by some miracle is able to stop it.  

Banned by LinkedIn!


Thursday, November 26, 2020

Return of Hillary's "Inevitability" Campaign...for "Pretender-in-Chief" Joe Biden

I'm working on a longer article about this, but just wanted to note here that it seems to me that in 2016 Hillary Clinton used an "inevitability" campaign to try and get elected, with support from the media. 

The idea was that the public would see her victory as inevitable, and so accept her taking office, even if there were some questions.

Lots of stories ran that it was mathematically impossible for President Trump to win the Electoral College and that Hillary would be the inevitable winner--to the point where she booked the Javits Center to celebrate "breaking the glass ceiling." Indeed, I still remember Judy Woodruff dressed in white appearing on PBS with Nancy Pelosi to say that Hillary Clinton had won election as first woman President.

None of it was true.

Sadly, no one was punished for that Big Lie. So they appear to be using the same strategy again for Joe Biden.

So now, despite obvious signs that Biden lost the 2020 Election "Bigly," the Biden Campaign and media are repeating the same strategy used by Hillary, except during the post-election phase...because they have sabotaged the vote-counting.

Instead of booking the Javits Center, the Biden Campaign has bullied the Trump Administration to allow them to open a "Transition" office in a GSA building. The media is once again saying the Democrat won, although all the genuine votes have not been counted and litigation is ongoing. News media refuse to report on the election dispute and call Biden "President-Elect," although he is not.

Because there are only two constitutional methods for someone to become a bona fide President-Elect: the loser concedes or the Electoral College certifies him.

Neither has happened yet. 

At this point, Fake News is flat-out lying on behalf of a Fake "Pretender-in-Chief."

Will come back to this issue later as events transpire in this regard...

President Trump's Gettysburg, Pennsylvania Election Fraud Testimony

Sydney Powell's Election Fraud Complaint

Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Peter Miller on the 2020 US Election


'Mirrors on the ceiling / 

The pink champagne on ice / 

We are all just prisoners here / 

Of our own device...

'Relax, said the night man, We are programmed to receive.

You can check out any time you like, But you can never leave!'

-- Don Henley 'Hotel California'

Unless you go to the eastward extension of California, where, as they say 'What
plays in Vegas, stays in Vegas'. There, odds-makers gave Trump an 8-to-1 shot
after the actual vote came in on election night. These are experienced
professional gamblers who bet large sums on election outcomes. Their forecasts,
measured by dollars, not polls of the six percent who answer pollsters' calls,
are the most accurate available. Yet even the pros were confounded by what
happened next -- an avalanche of mailed-in sheets of paper delivered in the wee
hours of the morning by the van-load, marked or destined to be marked for Biden. 

Orchestrated in seven States like the fairies in Disney's 'Fantasia', the
counting stopped after midnight as the size of the Trump landslide became
apparent, systems were re-set, and by 6:00 am on Nov 4, a new day had dawned.
Trump's odds suddenly dropped to 2-to-1, and deteriorated further as media
called States for Biden early while staying mum on States where Trump was
leading. Professional gamblers knew from that, that the fix was in, and switched
their bets accordingly. A few in the know who had bet on Biden when the odds
were 8-to-1 for Trump did very well for their evening's work. Wayne Root tells
the story here:

California often prefigures what happens to the rest of the country. If its
devolution into one-party-statehood has similar predictive value, it might be
worthwhile to know how this stunning transformation occurred. As a one-time
Californian (though not a native), I asked whether they had been using Dominion
voting machines, the kind that have become famous for producing miraculous
electoral victories for the likes of Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicholas
Maduro. These systems were ingeniously engineered by Venezuelan geeks to
specifications set by Chavez and his handlers the Castro brothers. They enabled
real-time monitoring of actual vote totals, with granular estimates of how many
additional (fabricated) votes would be required in each jurisdiction to produce
a desired result nationally. Chavez took a 28 percent ownership stake in
Dominion and sold vote-alteration systems to sympathetic regimes all around
South America (Ecuador, Bolivia, Chile, Nicaragua, etc.). 

These same systems, with suitable localization, were sold to 30 U.S. States,
including California, Nevada, Arizona, Illinois, Wisconsin, Michigan, Virginia,
and Pennsylvania. California officials sent me a link to this article by Katy

which lists the following California counties with Dominion systems installed:

Alameda, Butte, Contra Costa, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn,
Imperial, Inyo, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, Marin, Mono, Monterey, Napa,
Placer, Plumas, Riverside, Sacramento, San Benito, San Bernardino, San Diego,
San Luis Obispo, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Barbara, Santa Clara, Santa
Cruz, Shasta, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Ventura, and

California officials also sent me the attached graphic detailing the genealogy
of the voting-systems companies and their tortuous M&A, bankruptcy, and revival
paths. Regardless of the name -- Dominion, Smartmatic, Sequoia -- they all
feature the same larcenous software. This made me wonder whether the magical
transformation of California into a one-party State was engineered by algorithm
rather than deriving from unalloyed popular consent. Katy Grimes notes in her
article that Rep Doris Matsui (D-CA) received 76 percent of the 6th District's
vote (Sacramento) without even campaigning. Why bother pleading for votes when
you can program them? In the 12th (SF), 13th, and 14th Districts, Democrats
racked up 80 to 90 percent of the vote, proportions that Hugo Chavez himself
might envy. Grimes asks 'Does California need an audit of these 40 counties
which use Dominion Voting System?'

California actually has a long history with Smartmatic. Here is a link sent to
me on Newsom when SF Mayor arranging for their installation there:

Traditional methods were also in play. One official would-be observer in San
Mateo County wrote:

I was also unable to observe signature verifications at Tower Road [election
center] under the pretext that it violated privacy laws. I will be checking
with Election Integrity to clarify whether that is legitimate or not.

For years, California has been written off by those opposed to the one party in
control of the State. But maybe the popular support for that one party isn't
really there, any more than it was for the Communist Party in the Soviet Union,
which collapsed without providing any clues to the ever-watchful CIA. We'll
never know until there are honest elections. The first step would be an
independent audit. 

The people with the 'Trump 2024' signs are fooling themselves. If this year's
farce is allowed to continue, there won't be an election in 2024. 

In fact, there wasn't an election in 2020.

Wednesday, November 18, 2020

The Grinch Who Stole Thanksgiving (and wants to steal Christmas)

Currently, the Biden Campaign is using a genuine medical emergency as a pretext for a power grab. Their "war on Thanksgiving and Christmas" is designed to advance a revolutionary program, as detailed in the 2020 Democratic Party Platform, by holding Americans prisoner to Coronavirus.

The Biden campaign has, in my view, increased an oppressive political strategy in the aftermath of November 3rd's disputed election, when Joe Biden declared that no more than ten people should be allowed to celebrate Thanksgiving (although his own experts recommended a five-person limit). 

Red flag: Biden did not cite a single scientific study to support his recommendation.

And in what looks like a full-court press by national media, Democratic politicians and government officials are seemingly determined to make Americans as miserable as possible to force their surrender -- targeting both Thanksgiving and Christmas, as they did the Fourth of July.

Cynical political motives seem obvious, as patriotic celebrations or Trump rallies appear subject to stricter scrutiny than unpatriotic ones.

For example, Dr. Anthony Fauci refused to condemn either Antifa or Black Lives Matter "peaceful protests" as super spreader events in his Congressional testimony last July.

When Cong. Jim Jordan asked, "“Do protests increase the spread of the virus?" Dr. Fauci replied only: “I don’t think that’s relevant...I’m not in a position to determine what the government can do in a forceful way.”

That's not what he said when he lobbied for baseball stadiums to reopen. Incredibly, Dr. Fauci was photographed less than six feet from other people, with his mask off, at a Washington Nationals baseball game he had encouraged to take place despite COVID-19, in a venue where fans had booed President Trump during the 2019 World Series and where players kneeled in support of Black Lives Matter.

Yet, Dr. Fauci told the editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association that celebrating Thanksgiving this year may be too dangerous because of COVID-19.   

After this declaration Arlington National Cemetery cancelled this year's "Wreaths Across America" honoring American veterans--an outdoor event involving widely spaced gravesites, therefore unlikely to spread disease, just like baseball. But this time Dr. Fauci didn't object.

In the same interview, Dr. Fauci endorsed Melbourne, Australia's 120-day lockdown, which would end in March, 2021 if implemented here--essentially canceling Christmas.

On the other hand, Dr. Fauci didn't advise canceling Joe Biden's January Inauguration. Nor did he condemn Biden's crowded victory celebrations after Election Day.

Suppression of traditional national holidays in favor of political propaganda festivals has been a hallmark of revolutions, from the French Revolution and the Russian Revolution onwards. 

Nobody is hiding their agenda here. In my opinion, Democrats are using a genuine medical emergency as a pretext for a power grab. This "war on Thanksgiving and Christmas" is designed to advance a revolutionary program, detailed in the 2020 Democratic Party Platform.

Which is in keeping with Democratic politician Rahm Emmanuel's motto: "Never allow a crisis go to waste." His brother Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel is on Biden's Coronavirus advisory board.

In my opinion, this reveals Biden's intent to hold American citizens prisoner to coronavirus, to further claims on the Presidency as "Pretender-in-Chief" ruling a police state.

Another reason I support President Trump's challenges to election fraud.

Friday, November 13, 2020

You Don't Need To Count The Votes To Know That Biden Campaign Committed Voter Fraud

“You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.” -- Bob Dylan

As controversy and lawsuits swirl around vote-counting problems in swing states, I'd suggest Bob Dylan's insight applies to the 2020 election.

Simply from looking at the behavior of the Biden Campaign and their supporters, it is apparent that there was a premeditated scheme of voter fraud involved in Democratic Party efforts to retake the White House this year.

Here's the first clue: "Son of a bitch," Joe Biden confessed.

He told interviewer Dan Pfeiffer, a former Obama staffer: "...we’re in a situation where we have put together — and you’d [sic] guys, did it for our, the president Obama’s administration, before this — we have put together, I think, the most extensive and and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."

In Washington, a gaffe is when a politician tells the truth. This admission was definitely a gaffe. Because it obviously matches the behavior of Democrats in this election. It also matches an accidental admission from NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio's daughter, Chiara de Blasio, who slipped and admitted: “Joe Biden was able to steal…" 

Here's another giveaway--a party that really wants to count every vote doesn't cancel caucuses or primaries or choose a candidate without counting all the votes.  Because that's obviously voter suppression.

However, Democrats sabotaged the Iowa caucus when it looked like Bernie Sanders might win.

As the LA Times reported at the time: "The first electoral contest of the 2020 campaign turned into a major debacle Monday night as the Iowa Democratic Party failed to report the results of its influential presidential caucuses." 

Subsequently, they canceled the New York primary, as the New York Times reported: "The State Board of Elections scrapped the state’s June 23 Democratic nominating contest, citing the risk of spreading coronavirus, in a move opposed by supporters of Bernie Sanders."

Since New York was trending towards Bernie, and had to be stopped-- all NY Democratic votes were suppressed by the DNC, making a mockery of any purported concern for voter suppression.

Maybe Sanders didn't really want to be President, because he accepted cancellation in exchange for control over the party platform. However, there was obviously no free or fair New York Democratic primary--because there was no primary

Today, this year's Democratic primaries look like they were a trial run for general election malarkey--because all the votes were never counted.

Yet another "red flag"--Democrats poisoned the well against President Trump in advance.

Most significantly, well before Election Day Joe Biden publicly warned Trump against claiming victory if votes trended in his favor early, declaring: "... the president is not going to steal this election." Biden was joined in this pre-emptive strike against President Trump by a gang of retired military officers calling themselves "Count Every Hero" and other Democratic operatives, including David Becker of the so-called Center for Election Innovation and Research, who went so far as to opine: "There is no such thing as election night in the United States."

They also maliciously accused him, in the words of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, of waging "a campaign to sabotage the election by manipulating the Postal Service to disenfranchise voters.” This was done in order to create doubt and uncertainty about delivery of mail-in ballots, in order to allow delivery without postmarks to facilitate fraud, while simultaneously casting a pall of suspicion around anyone who dared to question their authenticity.

Another unbelievable Big Lie spread by Democrats was that that President Trump wanted to "kill hundreds of thousands of Americans" in order to win re-election, whether to stimulate the economy, or by encouraging in-person voting. For the record, elderly Joe Biden voted in-person in the Delaware Primary, with no apparent ill effects. I voted in-person in Florida's primary and general election, saw other senior citizens there, and had no health problems afterwards myself. Voting in-person was clearly no more dangerous than going to the supermarket, but that didn't stop the smear.

In addition to this slander, Democrats spread a false meme charging President Trump would not accept election results, this time in order to sow doubts about his integrity--designed to undermine in advance what would be any normal human being's reaction to their systematic nationwide ballot fraud scheme. 

So, when President Trump was pressured by journalists to concede the 2020 Election before it took place he simply sidestepped the question, saying: "Well, we'll have to see what happens..." 

However, this perfectly common-sense response was deceptively presented by most media outlets as a refusal to step down.

 For example, "journalist" Susan Page asked Vice President Pence this loaded question during his debate:

 “President Trump has several times refused to commit himself to a peaceful transfer of power after the election. If Vice President Biden is declared the winner and President Trump refuses to accept a peaceful transfer of power, what would be your role and responsibility as vice president? What would you personally do? You have two minutes.”

I'm 64 years old and have never seen a President refuse to leave office after a certified election in my entire lifetime.  In fact, it has never happened in all of American history. 

So, why would Page think there might be a problem this time, unless she knew in advance that Democrats were planning something unusual?

Not coincidentally, fellow journalist Thomas Friedman told us he wanted a coup in his New York Times column a while ago (Friedman has praised Communist China's one-party system, so his commitment to American constitutional democracy was not strong in the first place).

Published accounts of disgraced CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin's masturbation fantasy exposed Page was asking about planning for a media-led coupas detailed in The Spectator:

Toobin says he didn’t know his colleagues could see him when he pulled out his penis last week during an ‘election simulation’ held by the New Yorker and WNYC radio. In preparation for November 3, the two media organizations were playing out various scenarios of what’s likely to happen the first Tuesday in November, and after. New Yorker staff writers were cast as principal players. Biden was played by Evan Osnos, Trump by Masha Gessen. Jane Mayer dressed up as ‘establishment Republicans’. Clearly any election role-playing game would have parts for the candidates and their parties. But why fill roles for the US military and ‘the courts’, performed by Toobin himself?


Because it was a coup scenario: what happens if Trump fails to respect the outcome of an election that the New Yorker and other standard-bearers of the liberal order have already decided in favor of Biden? Answer: when the courts rule in favor of Democratic party lawyers litigating every district lost by Biden, and Trump locks himself in a White House bunker, the Pentagon will order the same SEAL team that killed Osama bin Laden to frogmarch the Orange Man in an orange jumpsuit out of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to the steady applause of a grateful nation.


The New Yorker exercise was part of a subgenre of fantasy fiction that has grown in popularity with the Acela establishment as the election draws nearer. Washington Examiner columnist Byron York coined the phrase ‘coup porn.’ 


In August, the New York Times reported on a war game conducted by The Transition Integrity Project in which former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta played Biden and after a Trump win alleged voter suppression. Rather than concede the election, he threatened that California would secede from the Union.  ‘Team Trump,’ according to the scenario, ‘encouraged provocateurs to incite violence, then used the resulting chaos to justify sending federalized Guard units or active-duty military personnel into American cities to “restore order”, leading to still more violence.’ It turns out that every outcome they gamed led to violence, except for a Biden landslide.


A scenario concocted by two retired Army officers assumed a Biden victory and Trump’s refusal to accept the ‘peaceful transfer of power’. That would leave Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen Mark Milley to decide between enforcing the Constitution and turning a blind eye to tyranny. ‘Should you remain silent,’ the authors warned Milley, and refuse to order troops to remove Trump, ‘you will be complicit in a coup d’├ętat.’


No wonder Toobin got overexcited.

One more giveaway--the name chosen for this coup was: The Transition Integrity Project.  Not "The Election Integrity Project." Because obviously actual election integrity would make "transition" to a losing candidate installed by the media impossible.

For the Democrats' coup to succeed, voting results would need to be muddied and reporting confused, chaos would need to be triggered among the general population, and a crisis generated of such proportions that Joe Biden would be able to "escort trespassers out of the White House" without legitimately winning the election...because nobody could know for certain who actually won. 

Which would be consistent with New York Times tweet (subsequently deleted) claiming the media, rather than election officials and state legislatures, decide elections. Why publicly declared partisans who have opposed President Trump since 2016, called that election for Hillary Clinton in advance, and never recognized the legitimacy of the current administration should be permitted to make such a blatantly unconstitutional claim in the first place is beyond belief.

Essentially they announced their role would be kingmakers propagandizing for one faction, rather than honest news media reporting election results...which delegitimizes and undermines confidence in the election itself. 

Partisans of one candidate may not claim the right to adjudicate an election, because such a claim is obviously unfair. You can't have fair elections with unfair judges.

Such an outcome would mean legitimacy would instead to be conferred by force rather than consent, since public confidence in election results would have been be subverted.

Which explains Nancy Pelosi's statement that President Trump would be "fumigated" out of the White House...a Nazi-like reference if I've ever seen one. Coming on top of her tearing up the State of the Union on live TV, it reveals a deep-seated contempt for the Constitution and the American electoral system.

No wonder Joe Biden called the American electorate "Chumps." That's exactly what he thinks of us.

Adding insult to injury, the Pennsylvania Attorney General announced in advance that President Trump would lose his state, calling into question the fairness of that state's electoral process.

Political Science 101: If you know the results of an election in advance--it isn't a fair election.

In addition to acts of commission listed above, there have been acts of omission.

Particularly this dog that didn't bark in the night: Last time I checked, nobody has cited this year's state-by-state exit polls on behalf of Biden's claims, unlike in the 2000 election battle between George W Bush and Al Gore. At that time, the Gore campaign pointed to exit polls data to argue he had done better than Bush in Ohio.  

Believe me, if any honest state exit poll had supported Biden, we'd know it by now. We don't, because they didn't.  More evidence Democrats knew he had lost.

After the election, the Biden camp continues to act guilty. 

Their actions illustrate a legal cliche: "If the facts are for you, argue the facts; if the law is for you, argue the law; and if both are against you, pound the table." And Democrats have been loudly pounding the table since Election Day.

First, they arranged for major news media and social media to call the election for Biden even though remaining votes had not been counted, the sitting President had not conceded, results had been disputed, and lawsuits had been filed alleging voter fraud and civil rights violations. Any honest journalist would recognize the dispute was the story--not phony claims of victory.

Indeed, calling the race for Biden made them part of the story, rather than objective reporters. They became partisans,  invested in a "narrative" they had constructed,  just like other subsequently discredited media crusades like the "1619 Project," "Covington Catholic Boys," "Jussie Smollet," "Christine Blasey Ford," "Trump Dossier," "Russiagate," and "Impeachment." The list goes on and on...simply put, media assertions lack credibility, due to an indefensible track record, including calling Hillary Clinton winner of the 2016 election and calling Al Gore winner in 2000.

Their 2020 Biden call marks a trifecta of errors and lies by seven major news media outlets deemed "official" by Twitter. Of course, calling unofficial media outlets with partisan agendas, "official" is misleading and harmful misinformation...because the only actual official counts are currently in dispute by the official officials officially responsible for the official results.

In other words, Twitter lied about who the officials are.  Then, to coverup their lies, they censored Trump supporters on social media and in traditional media. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social media sites slowed, throttled, shadow-banned, suspended, banned, deplatformed and otherwise persecuted Trump supporters, following their blackout on evidence of systemic corruption found in Hunter Biden's laptop.

In perhaps the most well-known example, Twitter suspended the New York Post.  USA Today killed Glenn Reynolds' column criticizing Hunter Biden's corruption, even though Reynolds is a law professor. Likewise, Fox News' Judge Jeanne Pirro was suspended for her criticism of already reported Biden crimes. Steve Bannon announced on-air the other day that his daily Warroom: Pandemic broadcast had come under cyberattack. There are many more such reports.

Nothing apparently has been too small to escape such censorship. 

I recently quit Twitter following my suspension after retweeting Roger Kimball's graphs illustrating Benford's Law, a type of mathematical analysis of statistical abnormalities used to discover data reporting problems.  

Even more disturbing are reports that President Trump had been censored 65 times by Facebook and Twitter following the election. Apparently, social media don't recognize his right of reply to the onslaught of attacks from the Biden Campaign and media in the 2020.

To make matters worse, Democrats are currently threatening blacklists of Trump supporters, a McCarthyite tactic noticed by Russian televison.  The Lincoln Project is among those making threats, behavior more suited to Communist Front "Lincoln Brigades" during the Spanish Civil War than an contemporary American Republican organization.

Even more chilling, some of President Trump's law firms have been pressured to drop him, as Daniel Greenfield has noted. Meanwhile, Justice Samuel Alito recently pointed out many in the legal profession have abandoned their commitment to First Amendment protections for free speech.  

Censorship, threats, and intimidation are not actions of people confident of the rightness of their cause. Like Mafia threats, they are they are desperate actions typical of desperate and lawless criminals, like the late Boston Irish Mafia boss "Whitey" Bulger, uncle of Hunter Biden's alleged business associate James Bulger

If Joe Biden really wanted to put the issue of systemic fraud in the 2020 election to rest, he and his supporters would obviously have welcomed ballot audits instead of fighting them.  He would want to have an open, fair and transparent inquiry to show that he was right. 

He would say: "Sue me." And look forward to his day in court. But he hasn't.

Instead, the  Biden Campaign, Democratic Party, and their supporters in the media are acting guilty. 

That alone should be enough to tell anyone with common sense that they are guilty as charged--without counting any votes.

In conclusion, I would recommend that Donald Trump follow Joe Biden's own advice to him and not permit Biden to claim early victory--as well as Hillary Clinton's advice to Joe Biden:

"Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I think this is going to drag out."

Wednesday, November 11, 2020

“This is slavery, not to speak one's thought.”

“This is slavery, not to speak one's thought.” ― Euripides, The Phoenician Women

Sunday, November 08, 2020

Twitter Said They Just Restored My Account...but did they?

Here's my response:

I don't believe it was an error.

If Twitter was wrong about my post, why should I believe them regarding the 2020 Election results?

Bottom Line: Twitter have no moral or legal authority to censor Tweets, especially given their proven record in my case--they are either reckless, as they apparently claim...or malicious, as I believe...or both.


12:42 PM Apparently even their apology is a lie: I don't have full functionality. I just tried to tweet, but got this message:


Strange Coincidence Today...


Charge is false:

Same thing happening to other people:

FYI re Twitter ban (same thing happened to this guy):

I hope all of you who have received Charlie's notice realize you will show up on any check as porn distributors. This is false and defamatory on it's face, and you should all be retaining lawyers.

Saturday, November 07, 2020

Why I Believe President Trump Won


Like "Russiagate" and impeachment, Joe Biden's putative "victory" is, in my opinion, a hoax based upon criminal fraud, enabled by Fake News. Which is why I believe Donald J. Trump won the 2020 Election fair and square.

Read the whole thing at TheLatest.com