Clarrifying policy between good, established democracies and bad, corrupt dictatorships is easy. Regime change in France would be silly; regime change in Turkmenistan would be most welcome. But what we increasingly see is a messy choice between good and bad democracies. In an age where democracy is fetishized by politicians and NGOs alike and where the EU, the US, and the UN require third world countries to hold elections before the recieve aid, the emerging challenge for policymakers is to recognize when democracies are dysfunctional and when dictatorships are enlightened.
“This is slavery, not to speak one's thought.” ― Euripides, The Phoenician Women
Thursday, March 24, 2005
Bad Democracies, Good Dictatorships
Curzon considers the paradoxes of democratization in the light of the Kyrgyz crisis: