The National Pulse: Transition Integrity Project May Have Role In US Capitol Attacks

While the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge that AntiFa could have infiltrated pro-Trump demonstrations, the Transition Integrity Project warned that election-related protests could be infiltrated by actors seeking to “turn peaceful protests violent.”

In 2020, The National Pulse exposed the Chinese Communist Party and Democrat-linked Transition Integrity Project (TIP) as working to fix a victory for Joe Biden. The group, which conducted wargames about potential election outcomes, is staffed and funded extensively by Obama administration alumni.

Read it all here:  https://thenationalpulse.com/news/transition-integrity-project-admitted-actors-protests/

Democratic Party Approved Riots Video Archive Goes Online

 Here:

https://mega.nz/folder/PgwzkDgT#HpdDx0nfULKPO1eUXS-edA

"Acts of Repudiation" by Communist Infiltration & The DemonRats

by Agustin Blazquez with the collaboration of Jaums Sutton

The current wave of vitriolic demonstrations of intolerance we are seeing in the U.S. is an old tool of the Marxist philosophy used by all of the left-wing regimes of history.

 

In Castro's Cuba the tool was used so frequently it had a name:  “Act of Repudiation.”

 

The decades of Marxist indoctrination being delivered by academia, media, social media and Hollywood set the stage.  It’s being executed by their “brown shirts” peons under the guise of “peaceful” demonstrators destroying, burning, looting, beating and intimidating the American population.

 

For those who have not connected the dots yet due to so much misinformation and propaganda from the mainstream media, I want to clarify:  Marxism is the root of totalitarian Communism.

 

Hitler’s Nazi National Socialist Party classified as Fascist, came from Marxism as well as Socialism, collectivism and progressivism.  It’s all the ruse of using benign sounding words to hide from and mislead uninformed people:  The goal of a totalitarian society.

 

The spread of Marxism in the U.S. has transformed "liberalism" to the antithesis of liberty, and use the Democrat Party to install a foreign ideology opposite to the foundation of the U.S. and the Constitution.

 

For decades now, many Democrat members of Congress are members of the Democratic Socialists of America.  This is an international front organization under the tutelage of and paid for by the former Soviet Union.  And now it is part of the global international communist network.

 

Communist Russia has been interfering in U.S. affairs through the Communist Party USA for decades.  And China--who managed to infiltrate America politicians, institutions and corporations! 

 

Although well-aware, members of the Democrat and the Republican Parties have been complicit and silent about it as has the mainstream media and even supposedly critical pundits.  They have been looking the other way while America is being invaded and corrupted.  Apparently they think their positions and power will be more secure under a “fundamentally transformed” United States.

 

The Democrat Party has descended so far to the left and has become so intolerant, fanatic, prone to violence and fraud that for quite a number of years I call them “DemonRats.”

 

Obviously it is no longer an American party and they don't protect and defend the security of the “We the people.”  They have become an enemy of the American people and their freedoms.

 

The control of our academic world by Marxist professors is invalid in a democratic republic.  They are reprogramming new generations of Americans.  The end result are millennials who are so ignorant and dependent on their political commissaries that they are clueless where Socialism will take them.

 

All Marxist derivatives lead directly to an all-powerful government where a ruling elite and bureaucracy dictate all aspects of our private and public lives.  It’s against the fiber of the creation of America.

 

Their goal is a global government with a mighty ruling elite at the top and everyone else--workers--at the bottom.

 

The corrupt, deceptive and censoring mainstream media and social media desperately spew “fake news” hatred toward Donald Trump 24-7 because he is the only roadblock left to their pursuit of their globalist goals.

 

The hatred directed at him is harsh and false but fits nicely under their tenet of “the end justifies the means.” They have been promoting these Acts of Repudiation since the Obama regime in public and private places to intimidate and silence Americans without any concern for private property and economic destruction.

 

These Acts of Repudiation are a communist/fascist technique used the former Soviet Union, their satellites and Hitler's National Socialist Nazi Party.  They are designed to terrorize and neutralize anybody who stands in their way.

 

Take a look at the documentary Act of Repudiation.  It is the story of an 11-day attack at the home of a classical guitarist, his wife and three young daughters.  If this intolerant, hysterical and violent atmosphere to intimidate and censorship continues in America we are all in for a rude awakening and will find ourselves in the hellhole of global Socialism and that will be final.

 

CLICK: ACT OF REPUDIATION / ACTO DE REPUDIO - YouTube

Peter Miller's Letter to Chris Boggs About Insurance Companies Paying for Antifa/BLM Riot Damages

Dear Mr Boggs,

Thank you for a very interesting and informative article on the applicability of
the Insurrection Act of 1807 to the current riots in American cities. The link
was sent to me by Laurence Jarvik in response to his article on BLM and Antifa
possibly owing reparations for damage they have caused:

https://thelatest.com/tlt/antifa-black-lives-matter-democratic-party-could-owe-americans-reparations-reparations-black-lives-matter-1596485365

It is quite helpful to have the original Insurrection Act, its applications, and
the exegesis of Latin terms defining applicability, or not, of the insurrection
exclusion to insurance claims.

I gather from your article that insurance companies will pay damage claims due
to rioting regardless of whether the Insurrection Act is invoked. This
conclusion appears to be based on a reading of the minds of the rioters that
they do not intend to overthrow the (Federal?) Government, i.e. that the riots
are random acts not attributable to any organized plan of revolt. This raises
three questions:

(1) What was the purpose of the bricks, shields, fireworks explosives, lasers,
and incendiary devices delivered to rioters? Were these deliveries made by some
organization that supplied funds, transportation, and staff, and if so, would
that level of organization fit the legal definition of insurrection?

(2) A novel feature of the current riots is that Mayors and Governors appear to
be encouraging them or are 'in cahoots with' the rioters. (That's not Latin, but
I trust the meaning is clear.) Local officials' explicit orders to police to
refrain from taking action to quell violent law-breaking, their sudden removal
of funds from police departments, disbanding of plain-clothes police units in at
least one city (New York), and their public endorsement of rioters' political
goals indicate a substantial degree of collaboration with those engaged in
violence, arson, and other illegal activities causing widespread property damage
(as well as loss of life, and injury). Indeed, unprecedented though it may be
since the Civil War, if any insurrection may be said to exist, it is one in
which insurrectionists have ALREADY CAPTURED local and State Governments. The
question then becomes: Would the insurrection exclusion apply to an effort by
local and State Governments, using BLM and Antifa as their militia, to overthrow
the Federal Government?

(3) If later evidence were to disclose a substantial degree of insurrectionist
organization, planning, intent, and purpose behind the riots in 20 or more
American cities, how would such evidence affect the insurrection exclusion? I
can only speculate on the nature of the evidence that might be found, but there
could be a trail of documents, emails, and phone conversations related to the
purchase and deployment of vehicles, explosives, lasers, incendiary devices, and
other materials and equipment not normally readily at hand. Websites and social
media sites have enabled calls for 'volunteers' who are paid to assemble at
pre-arranged times and places to await instructions from organizers. Of course
the language of such calls fits the 'peaceful demonstration' narrative whereby
said 'peaceful demonstrations' 'intensify', as one news source put it, into
violent rioting. Would such evidence 'trigger' the insurrection exclusion?

I am neither an insurance expert, nor do I have any bias (that I am aware of) in
favor of or against insurance companies. I am certainly sympathetic, as anyone
must be, to the business owners and individuals all across the United States who
have suffered collectively billions of dollars of damage to their property
caused by rioters and their collaborators in local and State Government. For the
sake of the communities that rely on the services those businesses provide, I
hope they can be made whole as soon as possible.

If insurance companies do not seek relief from claims-payments obligations via
the insurrection exclusion, then the cost of the damage from the current riots
will likely be paid by policy-holders in general, through increased premiums.
That might be considered an instance of the fundamental insurance principle of
risk-spreading. That, however, raises the further question of 'moral hazard'
similar to what occurred with Federal bailouts of mega-banks during the last
U.S. financial crisis. Could insurance payouts reduce societal incentives to
place financial responsibility where it belongs, namely on the rioters
themselves, and their sponsors? The risk, from both an insurance-company and
societal perspective, is that further riots (whether or not they are deemed
insurrections) with even greater loss of life, injury, and property damage will
be 'baked-in' to any arrangement that does not exact financial responsibility
from those who are in fact responsible.

Again, thanks for your article, which as you can see from the above, is
thought-provoking.

Sincerely,

Peter Miller

American Kristallnacht: May 30-31, 2020

You may not punish the innocent merely because they share some collective characteristics with the guilty. Therefore, to hold all white people responsible for the death of George Floyd is as immoral, unjust and dangerous as holding all Jews responsible for the suffering of Germany following World War One -- precisely what Hitler did.

Read the whole thing on TheLatest.com: https://thelatest.com/tlt/american-kristallnacht-may-30-31-2020-antifa-floyd-riots-hitler-1591043689

THE MARXIST WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN MIND

© ABIP 2019
by Agustin Blazquez, producer/director & Jaums Sutton, assistant director

 https://www.bitchute.com/video/lEGQvEhweMWl/ 

It's no secret that the academic circles, the mainstream media & the social media is composed of the left and far-left elements of America.  This fact has been obvious to refugees from Communist countries for decades.

We are very acquainted with their techniques and political discourse.  We know the real results and deaths that Marxist Communism and Socialism bring to the countries afected by those political aberrations.

The followers of Marxism become mindless fanatics of the creed of “The ends justifies the means.”  They get to power by lies and deceptions and with promises of “social justice," “fundamental transformation,” “free education and health care,” and other freebees.

Of course, this is only for the ruling elite.  For the rest is only poverty and dispair.  But this is never revealed by academia, media or typically restricted by “social media.”

The over 100 million deaths caused by Marxist Communism since 1917 are completely ignored.

Coming from a Marxist Communist country I readily noticed the infiltration of the media and academia by the proliferation of Marxist professors in colleges and universities.

What an absurd contradiction: Marxists teaching generations of children in a Capitalist Country!  Now we are seeing the results with so many millennials and high schools kids advocating for Socialism.

But the final battle for the “fundamental transformation” of America began in 2008 when this country was divided and class warfare was introduced.  The violent protests or “acts of repudiation” remainded me the ones conducted in my home country, Nazi Germany and all communists countries upon the homes of private citizens.  Which were similar to ANTIFA (supposedly anti-Nazi but using Nazi and Communist techniques).

And it carefully became prohibited to mention the middle name of the elected President.  A mention of it and you were acused of being a “racist.” For heaven sake, most presidents have a middle name!  Apparently this one was too close to home.

Of course the press and academia was supportive of the new direction the country was going, and remained silent on the consequences.  And censorship of social media began to cooperate with the Marxist's "fundamental transformation."

With a new President in 2016, academia, mainstream media and social media declared war on him and the people who supported him via attacks, incitement to violence of groups using fascist techniques.  They destroyed properties and silenced speakers in colleges and universities. They directed threatening demonstrations against TV political hosts and officials of the new administration.

And the censorship of social media and acussations of a litany: “white supremacists,” “racists,” “homophobic, ”misogynous, “Islamophobic,” etc. was and is repeated ad nauseam.

Among many others, the videos of Prager University were deleted from YouTube.  A few years ago I noticed that the visits of two of my videos of Hillary Clinton were suddently frozen and the other went down in number—which is supposed to be impossible.

On 8-26-19 one of my videos received an "R" age-restriction from YouTube.  In order to see it, you have to log on to YouTube with your login and password.  YouTube gave no reason for the restriction.

In light of the questioning of social media companies, I have to wonder if there is something in this video that they don't want you to see.

The count for this video has been slow.  Has the warning discourage everyonefrom watching or they have been manipulating the visits as they are doing to my Hillary videos?  Very clever indeed of the censors who disregard our liberties—including artistic—and constitutional freedom of speech.  Sad because this country was founded under the banner of liberty for all.

Now you can see this video at: https://www.bitchute.com/video/FbkZ4gbs9Fio/

According to the site it is to "promote freedom of expression.”

Beware of these Marxists because when they completely get control, they are lethal to your pocket, way of life, your beliefs and your existence from birth to death.

My advice, if you see one approaching you on a sidewalk, PLEASEcross the street.

I'm in the process of posting my videos on BitChute.com to make sure they are available.

In addition to YouTube my videos are available at Bitchute.com where you will be able to see for first time free of charge the full documentaries: CONNECTING THE DOTS: AN EXPOSE OF LIES, DECEPTION, SCAM AND FRAUD IN ORDER THE TAKE OVER THE USA, and CHE: The Other Side of An Icon (Too hot for PBS)  https://www.bitchute.com/video/lEGQvEhweMWl/ .  

Soon you'll be able to see the two short videos about Hillary Clinton too.

When is a Journalist Not a "Journalist?" When Antifa Attacks.

Journalistic reactions-- or lack thereof-- to Antifa's brutal attack on Andy Ngo in Portland have cast a stain on the reputation of the New York Times.

Read the whole thing at TheLatest.com: https://thelatest.com/tlt/q-when-journalist-not-journalist-a-when-antifa-attacks-antifa-journalism-new-york-tim-1561995420