Although he is having a hard time getting through the Senate, Bolton will go to the UN, possibly as a recess appointment this July. That gives him a year to build a record. My guess is that John Bolton will do a good job, and be confirmed after a year--if he's not confirmed before July.
POLITICAL FALLOUT: If the Senate doesn't confirm Bolton soon, Republicans can make the cloture vote an equivalent of Bolton's Up or Down confirmation -- and use it in 2006 Senate campaigns against vulnerable Democrats...
“This is slavery, not to speak one's thought.” ― Euripides, The Phoenician Women
Tuesday, June 21, 2005
When is an Ad not an Ad?
When it airs on PBS, according to Paul Farhi's Washington Post article Public Broadcasters Air Ads Against Federal Cutback.
What's wrong with this picture?
1. Public broadcasting isn't supposed to air ads;
2. Public broadcasting stations are prohibited by law from airing "calls to action" -- yet reportedly that is exactly what these ads do;
3. Public broadcasting must by law treat all matters of public controversy with "balance and objectivity"--yet these call to action ads are only giving one side of the issue.
Let alone the legal constraints on lobbying Congress resulting from campaign finance reform laws. So, if anyone had an interest in investigating public broadcasting in this regard, it probably would reveal a number of legal and financial scandals (ads cost money), some of which might result in Elliot Spitzer-like prosecutions, even some RICO provisions might apply.
Put Big Bird behind bars! (But I fear he might have more "protection" than Martha Stewart...)
What's wrong with this picture?
1. Public broadcasting isn't supposed to air ads;
2. Public broadcasting stations are prohibited by law from airing "calls to action" -- yet reportedly that is exactly what these ads do;
3. Public broadcasting must by law treat all matters of public controversy with "balance and objectivity"--yet these call to action ads are only giving one side of the issue.
Let alone the legal constraints on lobbying Congress resulting from campaign finance reform laws. So, if anyone had an interest in investigating public broadcasting in this regard, it probably would reveal a number of legal and financial scandals (ads cost money), some of which might result in Elliot Spitzer-like prosecutions, even some RICO provisions might apply.
Put Big Bird behind bars! (But I fear he might have more "protection" than Martha Stewart...)
NY Times Exposes -- a Conservative Grant Recipient at CPB . . .
The headline says it all: Public Broadcasting Monitor Had Worked at Center Founded by Conservatives.
IMHO the fact that it seems to be headline news when a conservative gets a CPB grant is evidence that something is rotten in public broadcasting.
IMHO the fact that it seems to be headline news when a conservative gets a CPB grant is evidence that something is rotten in public broadcasting.
A Shameless Plug for a Relative's Paintings . . .
At a family affair this weekend, I learned that my cousin Louise has a website for her paintings at louiselinkrath.net. She did the cover art for Ann Robinson's collection of stories, Ordinary Perils.
.
Public Broadcasting's Never-Ending Hoax
Even Amy Harmon of The New York Timesrecognizes that MoveOn.org is passing on an old "Save NPR and PBS" web hoax, even though there is no way the networks could possibly go off the air (NPR alone recently received a 200 million dollar bequest from McDonald's heiress Joan Kroc).
If the regulators at the FTC had any principles, they'd go after public broadcasters and their flacks at places like MoveOn.org for false, misleading, and deceptive marketing practices.
Of course, I'm not holding my breath...
If the regulators at the FTC had any principles, they'd go after public broadcasters and their flacks at places like MoveOn.org for false, misleading, and deceptive marketing practices.
Of course, I'm not holding my breath...
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Maybe Peggy Noonan Wants Another PBS Show...
Last time PBS faced a big funding cut, the network gave her a television show. Now, unsurprisingly, Peggy Noonan says she wants Republicans to save PBS.
I'm not saying that the Wall Street Journal has gone soft on this issue since they got their own PBS series, but once upon a time the editors used to ask me to write op-eds on the topic. Now, they don't.
I'm not saying that the Wall Street Journal has gone soft on this issue since they got their own PBS series, but once upon a time the editors used to ask me to write op-eds on the topic. Now, they don't.
Wednesday, June 15, 2005
PBS Back in the News
Phones started ringing again, after some 9 years, from people who want to know what I think about Republican threats to cut PBS funding. PBS, meanwhile, is engaged in a PR campaign that has led to stories like this on: PBS Updates Editorial Standards, Adds Ombudsman in the Washington Post today:
Actually, Jim Lehrer began his national PBS career as an ombudsman almost 30 years ago. He was hired to oversee balance and fairness when the network was under attack from Richard Nixon. It worked out OK for him--but not so well for President Nixon, when Lehrer hosted PBS's coverage of Congressional impeachment hearings.
IMHO the Republicans have been "all hat and no cattle" (Texas talk that Jim Lehrer and George Bush might understand) when it comes to zeroing out PBS and NPR. Useful for scare stories in the mainstream media to motivate the liberal donor base of the Democratic Party, but not much else. I'll believe they are serious the day I'm offered Jim Lerher's old job as PBS Vice-President for Balance and Objectivity.
Amid conflict over the political content of its programming, the Public Broadcasting Service yesterday unveiled editorial standards intended to ensure balance and fairness in its news, science and documentary shows.
Separately, Alexandria-based PBS also said it would hire an ombudsman for the first time to review controversial programs after they air.
Actually, Jim Lehrer began his national PBS career as an ombudsman almost 30 years ago. He was hired to oversee balance and fairness when the network was under attack from Richard Nixon. It worked out OK for him--but not so well for President Nixon, when Lehrer hosted PBS's coverage of Congressional impeachment hearings.
IMHO the Republicans have been "all hat and no cattle" (Texas talk that Jim Lehrer and George Bush might understand) when it comes to zeroing out PBS and NPR. Useful for scare stories in the mainstream media to motivate the liberal donor base of the Democratic Party, but not much else. I'll believe they are serious the day I'm offered Jim Lerher's old job as PBS Vice-President for Balance and Objectivity.
Friday, June 10, 2005
Congress to Cut PBS?
The New York Times says Congress is cutting funding for PBS. Frankly, I don't believe it, since so far President Bush has been giving PBS and NPR more money than they got under President Clinton--his thanks has been a barrage of anti-American propaganda designed to defeat the United States in the Global War on Terror, as well as promote additional anti-Republican agenda items. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
As I've said before, PBS and NPR money might better be used to pay for armor to protect American troops in Iraq.
As I've said before, PBS and NPR money might better be used to pay for armor to protect American troops in Iraq.
Thursday, June 09, 2005
"Mikhail Khodorkovsky is not the only political prisoner in Russia"
So says The Russian Dilettante's Weblog:
It is clear now, even to me, that Khodorkovsky is a political prisoner. But quite a few other people have been arrested in the course of the YUKOS investigation. All of them, I believe, should be considered political prisoners.
Most of these people are former employees of YUKOS and its affiliated companies. Unlike Khodorkovsky, who knew what risks he was taking, whose supporters are plenty and whose wealth is still considerable, most of these people were simply employees, neither rich nor powerful. They are not persecuted for their political convictions or actions, yet their persecution is politically motivated; hence, they, too, are political prisoners.
The most outrageous case, I think, is that of Svetlana Bakhmina, a mother of two and a former deputy head of YUKOS' legal department. Svetlana was arrested on Dec. 7, 2004, on a YUKOS-related charge, and has been imprisoned since. Kept in a cell with nine other women, she was denied phone calls to her children (seven and three years old) and went on a hunger strike to protest the ban. Investigators interrogated her for hours on end; after an eight-hour interrogation session Svetlana, who suffers from a chronic heart disease, collapse and was taken to -- alas -- a prison hospital.
What is to be done in Uzbekistan?
Nathan Hamm answers Michael J. Totten's call to dump Uzbek president Islam Karimov, in a thoughtful discussion of the difficulties facing American policy towards this Central Asian nation in the aftermath of the Andijan massacre. Nathan's bottom line is handle with care:
Uzbekistan's success is as important if not more important to Central Asia's future as Afghanistan. It's worth taking plenty of time to figure out the best way to proceed.
German TV: Bush Planned 9/11
I found Tom Goeller's Washington Times story through a link on the Drudge Report.:
Of course, this is so-called "black" propaganda, part of a "big lie" campaign against America.
My students in Uzbekistan believed this sort of nonsense, my students in Russia believed it, and I'm sure the Germans believe it also. That this sort of thing is being broadcast on German TV, in this day and age, is a troubling sign for the US, indeed...
A fictional crime drama based on the premise that the Bush administration ordered the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Washington aired this week on German state television, prompting the Green Party chairman to call for an investigation.
'I think absolutely nothing of the conspiracy theory that has been hawked in this series. I hope this particular TV movie will be discussed very critically at the next supervisory board meeting of ARD [state television],' said Green Party Chairman Reinhard Buetikofer, who acknowledged that he had not seen the show.
Sunday night's episode of 'Tatort,' a popular murder mystery that has been running on state-run ARD-German television for 35 years, revolved around a German woman and a man who was killed in her apartment.
According to the plot, which was seen by approximately 7 million Germans, the dead man had been trained to be one of the September 11 pilots but was left behind, only to be tracked down and killed by CIA or FBI assassins.
The woman, who says in the program that the September 11 attacks were instigated by the Bush family for oil and power, then is targeted, presumably to silence her. The drama concludes with the German detectives accepting the truth of her story as she eludes the U.S. government hit men and escapes to safety in an unnamed Arab country.
As ludicrous as it may sound to most Americans, the tale has resonance in Germany, where fantastic conspiracy theories often are taken as fact.
Of course, this is so-called "black" propaganda, part of a "big lie" campaign against America.
My students in Uzbekistan believed this sort of nonsense, my students in Russia believed it, and I'm sure the Germans believe it also. That this sort of thing is being broadcast on German TV, in this day and age, is a troubling sign for the US, indeed...
Wednesday, June 08, 2005
Anne Bancroft, Bronxite
The New York Times has a nice obituary of Anne Bancroft today. What I really liked is that Bancroft was an Italian girl from The Bronx, born Anna Louisa Maria Italiano. She was a versatile and talented actress, and always projected a certain cool elegance. Underneath, she must have been a volcano... Bancroft was great as the Miracle Worker as well as Mrs. Robinson. Mel Brooks was lucky to have been married to her.
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Vladimir Putin's Russia
Peter Baker and Susan B. Glasser have an interesting article in today's in today's Washington Post about Putin's path to power, taken from their new book, Kremlin Rising. It seems pretty accurate.
This quote, for example, rings true: "'The Russian people,' Putin's chief of staff, Alexander Voloshin, regularly told colleagues behind closed doors, 'are not ready for democracy.'"
This quote, for example, rings true: "'The Russian people,' Putin's chief of staff, Alexander Voloshin, regularly told colleagues behind closed doors, 'are not ready for democracy.'"
Kerry Dumber Than Bush
At least according to a Boston Globe report of his 71 average at Yale. Bush had a 76 average.
Fantastic!
Laurence Leamer has a new book out, a biography of Arnold Schwarznegger. I met him a million years ago, and based on what I know about him--and the fact that he's apparently been banned by the Today Show on NBC--think this new book may have some juicy tidbits of the Kitty Kelley sort...
Roger L. Simon v. Amnesty International
After its latest report on the American "gulag," Roger L. Simon says the international human rights NGO is, "in Orwell's evocative phrase,'objectively pro-fascist.'"
Aero Memories
OpinionJournal has a nice article today about Santa Monica's Aero Theatre, where I used to watch movies when I lived on the West Coast. It's nice to read that the movie house is still in operation. We had a similar situation here in DC with the Avalon movie theatre, I signed a petition to save it. A big real-estate developer, Douglas Jemal, did exactly that--and it is back in operation as an art house run by a foundation. They did a beautiful job with the restoration of the building, too. If it can happen here in DC, without a movie industry, it can happen in Santa Monica. So, I'll repeat a slogan of the day: "Save the Aero!"
Monday, June 06, 2005
Natan Sharansky on Uzbekistan
From the May 25, 2005 issue of The Forward:
In an interview with the Israeli daily Novosti Nedeli last August, Sharansky said that terrorism threats were a reminder that Karimov's uncompromising stance against extremists was justified, according to the BBC monitoring service.
"The Uzbek government adopted such an uncompromising position because it is understood in Tashkent, in the same way as Jerusalem, that the battle against terrorism is not some sort of tribal conflict; it is a world war of the forces of democracy against international terrorism," Sharansky was quoted as saying. He added, "It goes without saying that the strengthening, development and defense of democracy in Uzbekistan are an important part of the struggle for human rights all over the world. However, it would be a mistake to believe that the democratization process could be speeded up by way of slander and defaming the courageous struggle that Uzbekistan is waging against terrorism."
Mark Steyn on President Hillary Clinton (2008)
Read the whole thing:
A Rodham Administration would lend an obvious symmetry to the last two decades of Presidential history: Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton. But just as it rapidly became clear that Bush Jr was a far more consequential figure than Bush Sr, so the pants-suited Clinton would set out to be a more consequential figure than the pantsless Clinton.
Gag me with a spoon!
That's my response to the Investigative Reporters and Editors conference tribute to Dan Rather, which Little Green Footballs found described onVariety.com.
Rather than just quietly going away, Rather is staying "in your face" after the 60 Minutes II document fraud. Anyone paying tribute to this, to say the least, isn't an honest reporter or editor -- much less an investigative one, since Rather and company for some reason didn't bother to investigate the documents to determine their authenticity before broadcasting them to the nation.
Rather than just quietly going away, Rather is staying "in your face" after the 60 Minutes II document fraud. Anyone paying tribute to this, to say the least, isn't an honest reporter or editor -- much less an investigative one, since Rather and company for some reason didn't bother to investigate the documents to determine their authenticity before broadcasting them to the nation.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)